JAY / GEE / JOY DNA Project
What has been accomplished as of April
2007
FOUR
Distinct US JAY Lines have now been Identified by DNA
During 2005-2006, the JAY DNA Project specifically tested
known descendants of William JAY (m. Mary Vestal). The purpose of this was to
establish a control group for this line. This helped us better understand the
DNA marker variances that could be expected in a ‘typical’ ancestral line. This
control group also enabled us to specifically establish the exact DNA haplotype of William JAY.
In September 2006, we tested two descendants of Thomas JAY (b. 1779) of
Bedford Co. PA. The Bedford Co. PA JAY group is very large and boasts of 1000s
of descendants throughout the
In November 2006, we received the test results from a descendant of
Peter JAY (b. 1790) of Sussex Co. NJ / Lycoming Co. PA. His DNA matched neither
that of William JAY or Thomas JAY (1779).
In January 2007, we obtained a breakthrough match from a descendant of
the Rev. Patriot, Joseph JAY, born
![]()
During April 2007, 3 more donors test results have been received...this
data continues to help define JAY family relationships previously undocumented
or incorrectly linked!!! For all the details concerning these results click here.
![]()
The following are the current 13
Colonial JAY lines we are actively researching and testing……
1.
Augustus1655 = Augustus JAY born
2.
William1711 = William JAY born ca 1711, m. Mary
Vestal in Frederick Co. VA, died ca
3.
Stephen1733 = Stephan JAY born ca
4.
David1750 = David JAY born ca 1750, died
5.
David1752 = David JAY born 1752, Rev. Patriot, m. Polly, died 1833 Tioga
Co. PA
6.
Joseph1753 = Joseph JAY born
7.
Moses1760
= Moses JAY out of Sussex Co. NJ to Lycoming Co. PA is father of Peter JAY b.
1790 and probably John JAY of Lycoming Co. PA
8.
Joshua1765 = Joshua JAY born
9.
William1767
= William JAY born ca 1767, m. Anne King in Frederick Co. MD, died ca
1830
10.
George1774 = George JAY born ca
11.
John F.1777 = John Frederick JAY born ca 1777 in
PA, m. Sarah Mather, died ca 1846 in OH, probable
brother to George JAY1774
12.
Martin W.1785 = Martin W. JAY born ca
13.
John1754 = John JAY born 1754, married Elizabeth ter Bush, the Broome
Co. NY JAYs
Most of these particular
individuals are known to be at least second or third generation
What
Does this Tell Us?
1.
Each one of the above ‘non-matched’ lines had separate, distinct and unique
immigrant ancestors to the
2. The DNA mismatch is so great that a common ancestor would not have existed
within the last 9000 years.
This predates the creation and use of what we today
consider surnames.
3. They are totally different lines.
Continuing Goals
·
Identify and test a descendant of U.S. Chief Justice John
JAY of NY for testing
·
Continue to identify and test descendants of the untested 13
Colonial JAY lines
·
Identify and test documented descendants of Thomas JOY
(1611-1678), who immigrated to
.